- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 12:49:14 -0400
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
- cc: las@olin.edu, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
> I really really don't mean to _assert_ that the diagnosis is one in that
> particular list.
>
> What I do wish to assert is the <if> expression. The problem with RDF as it
> is currently defined (statement == triple == fact) is that I cannot assert
> an expression created of multiple statements (i.e. a subgraph) apparently
> without asserting each of the subgraphs within the subgraph.
(repeating Dan Connolly yesterday...)
This seems to be a common myth. Where in the current definition of
RDF does it say that you cannot describe (mention) a triple without
asserting (using) it?
(I wont be shocked if it does say it somewhere -- I'm not fond of the
current REC -- but I would love a pointer if you happen to know where
it says this.)
-- sandro
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2001 12:49:26 UTC