W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Why? Re: rdf as a base for other languages

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 12:49:14 -0400
Message-Id: <200106021649.MAA08964@hawke.org>
To: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
cc: las@olin.edu, www-rdf-logic@w3.org

> I really really don't mean to _assert_ that the diagnosis is one in that
> particular list.
> What I do wish to assert is the <if> expression. The problem with RDF as it
> is currently defined (statement == triple == fact) is that I cannot assert
> an expression created of multiple statements (i.e. a subgraph) apparently
> without asserting each of the subgraphs within the subgraph.

(repeating Dan Connolly yesterday...)

This seems to be a common myth.  Where in the current definition of
RDF does it say that you cannot describe (mention) a triple without
asserting (using) it?

(I wont be shocked if it does say it somewhere -- I'm not fond of the
current REC -- but I would love a pointer if you happen to know where
it says this.)

    -- sandro
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2001 12:49:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:35 UTC