- From: Peter Crowther <Peter.Crowther@melandra.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:46:11 -0000
- To: "'Jonathan Borden'" <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
> From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@mediaone.net] [...] > > >"Boston" is not > > >a URI, and neither is "4,367". > > Your name, "Boston" and "4,367" each have an unlimited > number of URIs e.g. > > http://www.google.com/search?q=Boston > > This URI references a collection of 7,200,000 other URIs each of which > reference a resource that at least at one time contained the > term "Boston" Yes, but none of those URIs are representations of "Boston". Instead, they represent results of searches about Boston, people who live in or have visited Boston, historical events... none of those URIs capture "essence of Boston". And there's another catch: Are we talking about Boston the place (which one? the one in England? the crater on the Moon?), the string B-o-s-t-o-n, or something else completely? "string:Boston" (or "data:<whatever-random-sequence-of-junk-would-decode-to-the-string>") would make at least part of that clearer, and such a system would remove most of my reservations about everything being a URI. There's a conceptual difference between the integer 4367 and any of the results of http://www.google.com/search?q=4367 that requires some magic to represent, whether we use URIs (integer:4367) or an alternative mechanism. - Peter
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2001 13:46:21 UTC