- From: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:50:19 -0700
- To: <nejdl@kbs.uni-hannover.de>, "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, "Wolfgang Nejdl" <nejdl@stanford.edu>
Wolfgang asks: [Brian McBride said:] > > o The model theory will be defined for RDF graphs, not n-triples. > > Why did you decide to define it for RDF graphs? Specifying the > semantics on n-triples is probably closer to the usual first order > logic formalisms (or Datalog), see e.g. our formalization of the > O-Telos-RDF variant (comparable to RDFS), > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2001Aug/0064.html). Because n-triples is only one of possibly many serializations of RDF graphs. Ron Daniel Jr. Standards Architect Tel: +1 415 778 3113 Fax: +1 415 778 3131 Email: rdaniel@interwoven.com Register for GearUp 2001, Oct. 9-12 The Year's Hottest Content Infrastructure Conference Visit www.interwoven.com/gearup2001
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 12:52:40 UTC