>IMO, XML Namespaces "outranks" RDF and therefore RDF must >toe-the-line insofar as what the XML Namespace defines; and >if it doesn't, then the XML community at large is not going >to like RDF too much. Ah, thanks for putting the issue squarely where it belongs. It's evidently a political matter, not a technical or philosophical one. At this point I will bow out and let the staghorns clash in the forest. Pat Hayes --------------------------------------------------------------------- (650)859 6569 w (650)494 3973 h (until September) phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayesReceived on Tuesday, 28 August 2001 20:09:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:34:47 GMT