W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > April 2001

Re: Reification

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:51:12 -0700
Message-ID: <004601c0c115$4c817380$b17ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
To: "Peter Crowther" <Peter.Crowther@melandra.com>, "'Danny Ayers'" <danny@panlanka.net>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
From: "Peter Crowther" <Peter.Crowther@melandra.com>

> > From: Danny Ayers [mailto:danny@panlanka.net]
> > Can you give me an example of a model that *can* be used to
> > capture the meaning?
> http://www.daml.org/2001/03/model-theoretic-semantics.html, amongst

Let me stick my neck out here again:   I doubt that any useful meaning will
be captured until  we can deal with the discourse level of interaction.  Yet
I don't hear any discourse concepts being discussed here or at the DAML
site.  My view is that the concept of meaning does not even emerge without
some kind of interaction between agents.  I doubt that I am alone in holding
that view .. ... perhaps someone else will provide some authorities

language: Semenglish
    (wants to show you the following diagrams for purposes of discussion)
        http://robustai.net/mentography/CoherentExperience.gif ,
        http://robustai.net/mentography/AxiomsOfSemWeb.gif ,
        http://robustai.net/mentography/SemBrowser.gif ,
        http://robustai.net/mentography/pentuples.gif ;
    (is seeking collaboration on programming a ) Sembrowser.
Received on Monday, 9 April 2001 12:54:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:34 UTC