W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > April 2001

Re: RDF IG ftf records? [was: Reification]

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:21:49 +0100
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: danbri@w3.org, www-rdf-logic@w3.org, GK@Ninebynine.org
Message-Id: <OF682B867E.6A6555FF-ON41256A29.005EEEED@bayer-ag.com>

it's OK now
the URI is http://www.w3.org/2001/02/rdfig-f2f/formalSys
(and it would be nice to speak that way)


connolly@w3.org@INTERNET@w3.org on 04/08/2001 03:10:35 PM

Sent by:  www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org

To:   danbri@w3.org@INTERNET, Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA
cc:   www-rdf-logic@w3.org@INTERNET, GK@Ninebynine.org@INTERNET
Subject:  RDF IG ftf records? [was: Reification]
jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote:
> if you refer to DanC's explanation during the RDF-IF F2F meeting last
> february, then I think it was some other stuff he mentioned ...
> at least he spoke about:
>   term
>   atom
>   formula
>   object
>   model
> Dan, any pointer?

Well the meeting page is

But no, it doesn't contain my presentation matierals.
I left those presentation materials on a borrowed
laptop; I was assured they would get into the meeting
record. I was also assured that the meeting record would
be produced in a timely fashion.

Dan Brickley, what's up?

W3C process requires that ftf meeting records be available
within two weeks of the meeting.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
pager: mailto:connolly.pager@w3.org
  (put return phone number in from/subject)
Received on Monday, 9 April 2001 12:22:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 11:10:34 UTC