- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:08:11 +0200
- To: " - *jhendler@darpa.mil" <jhendler@darpa.mil>
- Cc: " - *www-rdf-logic@w3.org" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, " - *connolly@w3.org" <connolly@w3.org>
> we wanted to release something very quickly that pretty much everyone > could agree to as a definitional language - so symmetric, reflexive, > transitive, etc. were left out because we didn't have agreement on > what the complete set was we wanted and what to do -- is on the top > of the list for next go around -- so it's a fruitful area for > discussion on this list. Well, actually we saw TransitiveProperty in daml-ont.daml and that triggered our thought. The equivalentWith property is important for tractable graph stuff and a mathematical model is a good thing. Anyway, we understand your points and we are looking very forward to that next go around! In the mean time, we could easily 'eat' the daml-ont.daml with a slightly modified version of DanC's rdfp.xsl transformsheet. -- Jos De Roo
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 18:09:24 UTC