W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > October 2000

Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:34:17 +0200
To: " - *www-rdf-logic@w3.org" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0006800032638411000002L012*@MHS>
Is there any reason for not having SymmetricProperty and
ReflexiveProperty classes? and EquivalentProperty class?
(which is redundant, but good for deductions)
Can we then say type(equivalentTo, EquivalentProperty)?
--
Jos De Roo
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 13:35:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:37 GMT