W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > October 2000

Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:34:17 +0200
To: " - *www-rdf-logic@w3.org" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0006800032638411000002L012*@MHS>

Is there any reason for not having SymmetricProperty and
ReflexiveProperty classes? and EquivalentProperty class?
(which is redundant, but good for deductions)
Can we then say type(equivalentTo, EquivalentProperty)?
--
Jos De Roo

Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 13:35:34 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat"
Previous message: Bill Andersen: "Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6]"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Dan Connolly: "Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat"
Reply: Dan Connolly: "Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat"
Maybe reply: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com: "Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:37 GMT