W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-logic@w3.org > December 2000

Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model

From: Graham Klyne <gk-lists@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 17:52:23 +0000
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001201175037.00be9510@pop.dial.pipex.com>
To: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
Cc: guha@guha.com, pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
At 06:08 PM 12/1/00 +0100, Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN wrote:
>Guha wrote:
> >  I have a simple (albeit potentially controversial) answer --- it is the
> > range of the interpretation of RDF expressions.
>
>Controversial, indeed ! I'm not sure I dislike it, although :)
>
>But strictly speaking, if it is true,
>then RDF describes Nodes and Arcs, not Resources...
>
>So, as I previously posed it,
>I think the grapoh is the *interpretation* of the XML *syntax*,
>but it is also a "higher level" *syntax*, whose interpretation is in the 
>world of resources (or entities, or both, I'm not sure)...

That nicely encapsulates some thoughts I had on reading Guha's comment.

#g

(Who has always preferred to view the _graph_ as the primary 
_representation_ of an RDF description.)

------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                       Content Technologies Ltd.
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Saturday, 2 December 2000 14:21:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:37 GMT