W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2004

RE: Web services returning RDF?

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:34:32 +0300
Message-ID: <1E4A0AC134884349A21955574A90A7A56471E6@trebe051.ntc.nokia.com>
To: <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>
Cc: <ian.dickinson@hp.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Benja Fallenstein [mailto:b.fallenstein@gmx.de]
> Sent: 18 October, 2004 12:25
> To: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
> Cc: ian.dickinson@hp.com; www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Web services returning RDF?
> 
> 
> Patrick,
> 
> Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> > You can also ask explicitly for a description via the URIQA 
> web service
> > portal, specifying the URI as a parameter. E.g.
> > 
> > 
> http://sw.nokia.com/uriqa?format=text/html&uri=http://sw.nokia
> .com/VOC-1/Vocabulary
> ...
> > 
> > If you want RDF/XML, leave off the format=text/html, as RDF 
> is the default.
> 
> <speaker accent="http://example.org/BritishEnglish"
>           tone="http://example.org/indignated">
> 
> Never! Have I not sworn a solemn vow never to peek inside a URI?
> 
> </speaker>
> 
> Sorry, I just couldn't resist ;-)


Ha ha. 

Well, I wasn't asking you to violate the principle of URI opacity, 
insofar as what those URIs identify, I was advising you regarding
the parameters to be provided to a web service portal interface,
which are simply expressed as a URI.

I.e. I was advising how to construct, not destruct and analyze,
a URI.

So, nyah nyah nyah....   ;-)

Patrick
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 09:36:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:10 GMT