-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12 Oct 2004, at 22:42, DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote: >> Hmm. I guess you want the equivalent of: >> <description parsetype="xml"> > > How would parseType="xml" be different from parseType="Literal", or > was that > just an alternative name for the same thing that ended up not being > chosen? It's different because it's late and I wasn't concentrating ;-) Literal is what I meant, but my fingers thought they knew better. > thanks, > > Bob No problem. Glad you worked out what I intended :-) Damian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBbFIwAyLCB+mTtykRAvsSAJ99kQanjZ82v9WnNhB+QMpMR7hr7gCg+qrG YGbI/qcb6g8e17KAzt2CcXs= =vKfg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 21:53:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:10 GMT