W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2004

Re: F2F RDF IG, agenda

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:50:05 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040131014131.00b9f0a0@127.0.0.1>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

At 04:20 29/01/04 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:
>Draft meeting page is at
>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/meetings/tp2004.html
>
>As you can see, the agenda needs more work. I suggest we discuss
>agenda here (www-rdf-interest) with proposals for lightning talks,
>presentations etc by 9Feb for a finalised agenda 15Feb.
>
>Hope to see some of you there,

I shall attend -- I'm sure there's lots of interesting stuff for us to discuss.

But I see the agenda is currently very bare.  There are two possible topics 
that are close to my interests, one general, one technical:

(a) how to present RDF and Semantic Web technologies to a wider audience in 
a way that makes a compelling case for their use (where 
appropriate).  Related to this, what makes an application a good candidate 
for employing Semantic Web technology?

(b) how RDF applications can/should use the datatype capabilities that have 
been designed into RDF.  The only formally sanctioned use of these of which 
I am aware is their use by OWL for cardinality constraints.  (I have done a 
little work on this area [1,2], and could offer a lightning talk if there's 
interest; what's the expected format/duration for these?)

#g
--

[1] http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/RDF-Datatype-inference.html

[2] http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/Swish/Intro.html


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 21:04:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:04 GMT