W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2004

Re: SWIG agenda at plenary?

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:06:40 +0100
To: "Dan Brickley <danbri" <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF71082D87.F33AC6F6-ONC1256E43.0077CED9-C1256E43.007EF723@agfa.be>


Dan,

> OK I've updated the page with a list of topics culled
> from proposals for talk-time folk have made. I have begun the task of
> allocating things to mon/tuesday morning/afternoon slots,
> but there's more to do there.
>
> See: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/meetings/tp2004#topics
>
> Feedback/suggestions and especially background reading links welcomed,

3 years ago in http://logicerror.com/w3c-meeting-2001-2-26
(that was at the technical plenary 2001 in Cambridge MA)
I said that "N3 is good way of doing notation" and that
"I've found nothing better" and that is still the case!
So I would like to suggest background reading of "Semantic
Web Tutorial Using N3" http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/

While at it, I'm still doing well without additional
notation for naming graphs. For the normal case of flat
graphs written in rdf documents with uri's it is quite
obvious for an engine to keep track from where it got a
specific triple. The same can be said for the implications,
although for that, we have a hack in use and write an
extra triple in the premise to explicitly explain that
:ruleXyz has log:racine <uri-of-the-theory>.
(although we also sometimes simply use :ruleXyz. which
was first inspired by Pat... :))

In the context of SWBP I'm thinking about some point
[[
o repository of test cases using existing standard vocabularies
  (e.g. healthcare UMLS, OpenGALEN, NCI, SNOMED, ICD9, MeSH, ...)
  also by using an ontology in which one can say things like
  "this is something which is called xyz by that standard/body"
]]
but am not finding a concise rdf formulation of that
  "this is something which is called xyz by that standard/body"
any hints ??

thanks for organizing :)

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 18:06:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:58 UTC