On 07.02.2004 21:30:12, Eric Jain wrote: >... It's sunday, I'm skipping the tricky ones ;-) >So the question is, what's the benefit of being in the OWL space. >Perhaps being an owl:Thing is a prerequisite for being referenced from >another OWL construct such as enumerations. However I wonder if this >also applies in the reverse direction, i.e. would an instance of an >owl:Class be required to be an owl:Thing, or would this be implied even >if not explicitely stated? As far as I understand, OWL individuals are by definition members of owl:Thing. >Questions over questions... did you try posting to www-rdf-logic? It's the ml the webont wg recommends for owl-related questions, IIRC. cheers, benjamin -- Benjamin Nowack Kruppstr. 82-100 45145 Essen, GermanyReceived on Sunday, 8 February 2004 10:00:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:04 GMT