Re: Thoughts on W3C RDF/SW mailing list reorganization?

Dan et al :

IMHO it is wise to consider how best to serve the needs of those who (1)
have pure-RDF questions and (2) have semantic ponderances. Given that
assessing RDF is essential for semantic folk the two topics can happliy
co-exist for now.

happy holidays
carl

<quote who="Dan Brickley">
>
> A while ago I began work on a page which was intended to serve as
> both a draft 'welcome to the Semantic Web Interest Group' page, and
> an overview of a (possibly somewhat reorganised) list of mailing lists
> that are associated with this Interest Group.
>
>> ...I could go on, but this isn't meant to be a formal survey, just a
> starting point for discussion. I'm interested to hear whether the
> current lists W3C provide are working for you, as SW IG members. There is
> of course then the question of how we learn about the needs of folk who
> don't subscribe to this list, or who unsubscribed, or who pipe it into a
> mail folder and rarely read it. Suggestions on how to go about this
> would be gratefully received...
>
> Thanks for any thoughts,
>
> Dan
>
>


-- 
Carl Mattocks

co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC
co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC
CEO CHECKMi
v/f (usa) 908 322 8715
www.CHECKMi.com
Semantically Smart Compendiums
(AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi