Concise Bounded Descriptions - updated, expanded, stand-alone definition

A draft of an updated, expanded, stand-alone definition for Concise
Bounded Descriptions is now available

  http://swdev.nokia.com/uriqa/CBD.html

Cheers,

Patrick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere) 
> Sent: 17 August, 2004 12:51
> To: 'danny.ayers@gmail.com'
> Cc: JohnBlack@deltek.com; mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk;
> www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Ideas for store for IFP smushing
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Danny Ayers [mailto:danny666@virgilio.it]
> > Sent: 17 August, 2004 12:40
> > To: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
> > Cc: JohnBlack@deltek.com; mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk;
> > www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Ideas for store for IFP smushing
> > 
> > 
> > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> > 
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere) 
> > >>Sent: 17 August, 2004 08:48
> > >>To: 'ext John Black'; mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk
> > >>Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> > >>Subject: RE: Ideas for store for IFP smushing
> > >>
> > >>    
> >
> > By way of encouragement - I think a Note on CBDs decoupled 
> from URIQA 
> > would probably be very well received. It may even help the 
> > case for URIQA.
> 
> That sounds like a good idea. I'd especially like to see the DAWG
> include something like or equal to the CBD def as a recommended
> response form for DESCRIBE queries, and a Note defining nothing
> but CBDs would probably help that.