W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2004

RE: Ideas for store for IFP smushing

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:51:14 +0300
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B0263049C@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Cc: <JohnBlack@deltek.com>, <mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Danny Ayers [mailto:danny666@virgilio.it]
> Sent: 17 August, 2004 12:40
> To: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
> Cc: JohnBlack@deltek.com; mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk;
> www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Ideas for store for IFP smushing
> 
> 
> Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> 
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere) 
> >>Sent: 17 August, 2004 08:48
> >>To: 'ext John Black'; mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk
> >>Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> >>Subject: RE: Ideas for store for IFP smushing
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>What is the status of efforts to make 
> >>>this work into a standard? Was a note ever submitted to the W3C as 
> >>>was suggested at one point? 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >Oops. Forgot to answer this question.
> >
> >To date, no Note has been submitted. It is still a worthy
> >consideration. I got buried in several other higher priority
> >tasks and it subsequently got pushed aside.
> >
> >Perhaps now would be a good time to reconsider producing
> >a Note. 
> >  
> >
> By way of encouragement - I think a Note on CBDs decoupled from URIQA 
> would probably be very well received. It may even help the 
> case for URIQA.

That sounds like a good idea. I'd especially like to see the DAWG
include something like or equal to the CBD def as a recommended
response form for DESCRIBE queries, and a Note defining nothing
but CBDs would probably help that.

> 
> (Personally I'm agnostic on URIQA as a whole - seems a good idea, but 
> reluctance to add new verbs appears an insurpassable obstacle).

True. Which is IMO a pity.

Cheers,

Patrick
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2004 09:55:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:57 UTC