Re: Ideas for store for IFP smushing

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:

>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere) 
>>Sent: 17 August, 2004 08:48
>>To: 'ext John Black'; mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk
>>Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
>>Subject: RE: Ideas for store for IFP smushing
>>
>>    
>>
>>>What is the status of efforts to make 
>>>this work into a standard? Was a note ever submitted to the W3C as 
>>>was suggested at one point? 
>>>      
>>>
>
>Oops. Forgot to answer this question.
>
>To date, no Note has been submitted. It is still a worthy
>consideration. I got buried in several other higher priority
>tasks and it subsequently got pushed aside.
>
>Perhaps now would be a good time to reconsider producing
>a Note. 
>  
>
By way of encouragement - I think a Note on CBDs decoupled from URIQA 
would probably be very well received. It may even help the case for URIQA.

(Personally I'm agnostic on URIQA as a whole - seems a good idea, but 
reluctance to add new verbs appears an insurpassable obstacle).

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 

Raw
http://dannyayers.com