At 12:59 24/10/03 +0200, Emmanuel Pietriga wrote: >I agree that it is something useful. But isn't this what XSLT already >does? That's what it does for XML. So why couldn't it do it for RDF? I >mean, except for the XPath part that is not (as discussed yesterday) the >best-suited technology to address nodes and arcs of an RDF graph, XSLT >seems to be well-suited to this task (all that is needed is to replace >XPath selectors by *RDFPath* selectors). I think that's a really interesting idea... using the existing XSLT design to its strengths and directly addressing its weakness with respect to RDF data. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#ContactReceived on Sunday, 26 October 2003 05:33:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:12 GMT