W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2003

RE: AW: Literals representing people?

From: LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1) <james.lynn@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:41:59 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F193BF0B0@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)" <james.lynn@hp.com>, "ext Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

So just to make sure I'm not missing anything, 1 has a node named _:x which
is a blank node in 3 and is totally omitted in 2.  But for these
differences, they would all be equivalent. 

1	<#me> ex:myFriend _:x .
	_:x ex:emailAddress <mailto:somebody@example.com> .
 
 
2	<#me> ex:someFriendsEmail <mailto:somebody@example.com> .


3	<#me> ex:myFriend [ ex:emailAddress  <mailto:somebody@example.com> ]
.


James
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2003 11:42:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:02 GMT