>> Sandro - thanks for that >> we do have some results in >> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/temp/rdf-result.rdf > > Great. I've added them. Wow! > Actually, I had to run sed over them first, changing "Manifest#" to > "Manifest.rdf#", since RDF Core uses a difference convention here from > WebOnt (and your data file uses the WebOnt convention). Let me know > when I can take sed out of the pipeline. I've corrected the results:test objects; sorry for the confusion... (and also run datatypes-intensional-xsd-integer-string-incompatible) > Is anyone working on code which is expected to pass the Non-Entailment > tests? Any of the DL reasoners, perhaps? (Of course there are > things entailed in DL semantics which are not entailed in Simple RDF, > so there might be some FAILs, but I bet there are no RDF Core tests > for any of that stuff. :-) Good bet :-) In our case we have that for a P.E.T. the result is Passing or Undecided and for a N.E.T. it is the opposite i.e. Failing or Undecided (I also switched now to UndecidedRun instead of IncompleteRun as you proposed a while back...) >>> I've started to build an RDF Core Test Results presentation page (like >>> the one I made for OWL [1]); you can see the current version at: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2003/11/results/rdf-core-tests >>> >>> My only feed so far is: >>> >>> http://www.redland.opensource.ac.uk/raptor/testcases/results.rdf >>> >>> (thanks, Dave!) >>> >>> Another example feed (for OWL test results, not RDF ones) is: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2003/08/surnia/test-results/00013/results.rdf >>> >>> If you have a system which can pass any of the RDF Core tests, please >>> try to create a data feed I can use in this report. Send me e-mail >>> (cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org) with the URL. If you have difficulties >>> or concerns, please let me know so I can make the process easier. >>> >>> -- sandro >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 18:51:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:03 GMT