Re: (Round 2) Proposed Extensions to OWL from Roger L. Costello on 2003-06-30 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from June 2003)

From: Roger L. Costello <costello@mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:31:31 -0400
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
CC: tpassin@comcast.net, "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Message-ID: <3F0057D3.103E12A5@mitre.org>

Tom Passin wrote:

Here is what I think is a faithful reflection of the original intent:

<River rdf:ID="Yangtze">
    <length-measure>
        <value>
            <transform rdf:resource='#LengthInKilometers'/>
            <number>6300</number>
        </value>
    </length-measure>
</River>

.....

My comments:

Excellent!  My only comment is that this is not in the RDF
Class/property/value design pattern.  Let me recast it into proper RDF
format:

<River rdf:ID="Yangtze">
    <length>
        <LengthMeasure>
            <transform rdf:resource='#LengthInKilometers'/>
            <number>6300</number>
        </LengthMeasure>
    </length>
</River>

Do you agree?  /Roger

Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 11:31:43 UTC