Re: (Round 2) Proposed Extensions to OWL

Ian Stuart wrote:
> I just have a problem with trying to scale your 1-inch is the same as
> 2.45cm (do we include mm, cubits, fathoms, vara, feet [and who's "foot":
> russian, english or roman?)

A good reason to use URIs rather than literals for the units, so that 
the different "feet" are well distinguished :)

-b