Re: (Round 2) Proposed Extensions to OWL

"Richard H. McCullough" wrote:

> I see Jon's point, but am not totally convinced that another resource
> is necessary. (1) More attributes can be supplied for the "length"
> property.  (2) I think the logic of a "measurement" resource could be
> applied equally well to a "length" property.

None of the ideas are set in concrete, so please express your ideas.  Could
you elaborate upon your thinking?  /Roger