W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > July 2003

RE: (Round 2) Proposed Extensions to OWL

From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 12:58:11 +0100
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBLCBLIMDOPKMOPHLHIEBPFFAA.jon@spin.ie>

> I see Jon's point, but am not totally convinced that another resource
> is necessary.

I think the addition of another resource is the easiest way to deal with
those cases where the degree of detail it offers is necessary. I do agree
that it is overly verbose for a lot of applications, some sort of dumb-down
mechanism that would allow the more detailed approach to co-exist with the
simpler would be a good thing I think.
Received on Monday, 7 July 2003 07:56:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:00 GMT