W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > July 2003

RE: (Round 2) Proposed Extensions to OWL

From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:23:46 +0100
To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

> This could be better.  It depends on whether you want the Length of the
> river to be a thing in itself, separate and apart from its measure(s).  In
> my original thinking, I saw the length as a thing in itself, but in the
> thrill of striping I seem to have lost that.

I don't think we can avoid it being a thing in itself. The choice is whether
we take advantage of it's being a thing in itself or not, and as such take
advantage of what RDF offers when we've defined something as a resource
(typing, subClassOf relationships, etc.).
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 09:21:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:46 UTC