RE: (Round 2) Proposed Extensions to OWL

> This could be better.  It depends on whether you want the Length of the
> river to be a thing in itself, separate and apart from its measure(s).  In
> my original thinking, I saw the length as a thing in itself, but in the
> thrill of striping I seem to have lost that.

I don't think we can avoid it being a thing in itself. The choice is whether
we take advantage of it's being a thing in itself or not, and as such take
advantage of what RDF offers when we've defined something as a resource
(typing, subClassOf relationships, etc.).