W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2003

RE: RDQL implementation (was RE: DOUBT)

From: Seaborne, Andy <Andy_Seaborne@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:07:48 -0000
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F0586D252@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Eric Miller'" <em@w3.org>
Cc: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

Eric,

I hope the implementers of those systems will confirm but, yes, I believe
they all provide RDQL.  Those are the ones I know of: people have been
taking the BNF and implementing.

Eric Prud'hommeaux has updated:
   http://www.w3.org/2001/11/13-RDF-Query-Rules/

	Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Miller [mailto:em@w3.org] 
> Sent: 24 January 2003 17:55
> To: Seaborne, Andy
> Cc: 'frozados@fibertel.com.ar'; 'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'
> Subject: RDQL implementation (was RE: DOUBT)
> 


> Hi Andy, 
> 
> switching gears slightly from the original post (hence the new subject
> as not to confuse things)... Do I understand you to say that RDQL is
> supported as a query language in all 4 of the above mentioned RDF
> implementations?  Any there any implementations that you know of?
> 
> -- 
> eric miller                              http://www.w3.org/people/em/
> semantic web activity lead               http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
> w3c world wide web consortium            http://www.w3.org/
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 24 January 2003 13:08:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT