W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2003

RE: abstract class

From: Marc Carrion <marc_carrion@yahoo.es>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20030123154921.39461.qmail@web11903.mail.yahoo.com>
To: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

  I meant, I can have 
      <ns:C rdf:ID="foo"/>

--- Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie> wrote:
> 
>     To express that the 'rdfs:domain' of a property
> > > is
> > > >A or B, we should create the class C and define
> A
> > > and
> > > >B as 'rdfs:subClassOf' of C; since class C
> remains
> > > >instantiable, we would like to define C as
> > > abstract.
> 
> What do you mean "C remains instantiable"?
> 


=====
......\|||/................................................
      (. .)
-oOOo---0---oOOo-------
|marc_carrion@yahoo.es|
|   ooO  Ooo          |
----( )--( )-----------
     ()  ()

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 10:49:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT