W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2003

RE: abstract class

From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:41:09 -0000
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBLCBLIMDOPKMOPHLHCEOAEMAA.jon@spin.ie>


    To express that the 'rdfs:domain' of a property
> > is
> > >A or B, we should create the class C and define A
> > and
> > >B as 'rdfs:subClassOf' of C; since class C remains
> > >instantiable, we would like to define C as
> > abstract.

What do you mean "C remains instantiable"?

Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 10:41:21 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marc Carrion: "RE: abstract class"
Previous message: frozados@fibertel.com.ar: "DOUBT"
In reply to: Marc Carrion: "abstract class"
Next in thread: Marc Carrion: "RE: abstract class"
Reply: Marc Carrion: "RE: abstract class"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:06 GMT