W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2003

RE: KR & W3C (was KR & Issue/bug tracking terms in RDFS?)

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:42:12 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030110163846.00a3dc50@127.0.0.1>
To: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>
Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

At 01:16 PM 12/21/02 +0100, Danny Ayers wrote:
>1) Though RDF draws on previous AI material (many of the people working on
>it have first-hand knowledge of the past 30 year's work), it is almost
>certainly a big mistake to view it as an AI language - it is primarily a web
>language, and is firmly grounded in existing web technologies. As Eric
>Miller (W3C's Semantic Web Activity Lead) recently said, "it's not
>artificial and it's not intelligent".  (can't find the ref, sorry)

Quote noted at:  http://news.com.com/2100-1001-966208.html

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 10 January 2003 11:54:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT