W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Arguing against quads

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:39:28 -0800
Message-ID: <000901c2b45b$4cd38770$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
To: <seth@robustai.net>, "Bob MacGregor" <macgregor@ISI.EDU>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I designed MKR using the first method.  
I decided on a context theory, and then implemented it.
It works -- in theory & in practice.
============ 
Dick McCullough 
knowledge := man do identify od existent done
knowledge haspart proposition list

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob MacGregor 
  To: seth@robustai.net 
  Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org 
  Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:11 PM
  Subject: Arguing against quads
  <snip>

  There are two ways that progress happens in the KR field.  One
  is that nice theoretical models are devised, and then implementers
  figure out efficient implementations for them.  The other is that
  implementers play around with various things, and find out
  experimentally what users find useful, and then later (possibly much
  later), the resulting semantics gets formalized.  Contexts fall into 
  this
  latter category. 
  <snip>
Received on Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:39:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT