W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2003

OWL & RDF

From: Jingdong Liu <jingdong.liu@sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:13:36 -0500
Message-ID: <004c01c2dc49$98712370$0de5fea9@DCR8PM11>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>


Does someone know why OWL keep the syntax of RDF? And saying the following
two expressions are the same and both allowed
<owl:Class rdf:ID="Continent"/> <rdf:Description rdf:about="#Continent">
  <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class"/>
</rdf:Description>Can we get rid of RDF?J LIU

Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 16:13:37 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Peter Crowther: "RE: OWL & RDF"
Previous message: Seth Russell: "example of a non-monotonic inference needed for interpreting the social meaning of RDF in e-commerce"
In reply to: Yolanda Gil: "TRELLIS 3.0 released open source"
Next in thread: Peter Crowther: "RE: OWL & RDF"
Maybe reply: Peter Crowther: "RE: OWL & RDF"
Maybe reply: Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch: "RE: OWL & RDF"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT