W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2003

Re: call for alpha testers EulerSharp for dotgnu/pnet

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 03:25:49 +0100
To: "James Michael DuPont <mdupont777" <mdupont777@yahoo.com>
Cc: developers@dotgnu.org, introspectors <introspector-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>, Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, minddog@cannibutter.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF00FBA424.B35ED2B5-ONC1256CC8.000B9E03-C1256CC8.000D61E7@agfa.be>

> Thanks,

you're welcome Mike

> maybe we can find a savannah page for this?  We need a cvs.
> Otherwise we can host it under one other project.

dunno what a savannah page is, but don't mind
I think it's up to you here to come up with
a good proposal ;-)

> I would like to use this to process the RDF from the gcc, inside the
> gcc,

sounds good!
thoughts about other testcases?
(preferably using proofs)

>  For embedding the Euler into the GCC, i need only GPL modules.
> I would like to re-licensed Euler under the GPL, is that possible?

what really matters to me is "W3C SOFTWARE NOTICE AND LICENSE"
-- http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
and therefore I would like to follow that one
in there I read that it
is written so as to preserve the Free Software Foundation's
assessment of GPL compatibility and OSI's certification under
the Open Source Definition.

> BTW:
> I have just commited the updated dotgnu RDF stuff
> you can find it here:
> CVS: cvs -z3
> -d:pserver:anoncvs@subversions.gnu.org:/cvsroot/dotgnu-libs co
> dotgnu.rdf
> and I made a source deb :
> you can find the dotgnu stuff at www.dotgnu.org, I suggest using the
> cvs.

will definitely do that asap!

have a nice weekend

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2003 21:26:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:44 UTC