W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2003

Re: Alternatives to XML for RDF?

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 09:12:17 -0700
Message-ID: <002d01c360ec$9e5e3bb0$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org>

I just skimmed through the Adenine paper.
It certainly is easier to read than XML,
but it's a far cry from MKR.

MKR was specifically designed to be English-like
for easy readability.

MKR is also UNIX-shell-like which makes for 
easy integration with Linux & Windows commands.

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: Alternatives to XML for RDF?


> 
> In article <001501c36072$7a0a9d00$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>,
>  "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net> wrote:
> 
> > Since nobody else has mentioned MKR, I will say that
> > it is also much nicer than XML.
> > 
> >     http://rhm.cdepot.net/
> > 
> > MKR is also a more powerful language -- it includes
> > context, questions and commands.
> 
> I found another one called Adenine, part of the Haystack project, that 
> seems to be similar.
> <http://haystack.lcs.mit.edu/documentation/adenine.pdf> [PDF]
> 
> -- 
> Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 12:13:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:01 GMT