W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2002

Re: rdf:parseType="daml:collection"

From: Roland Schwaenzl <Roland.Schwaenzl@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:17:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <200209061317.PAA06867@scarlett.mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
Cc: ashley@semantic.org


> From www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org Fri Sep  6 12:19 MET 2002
> Resent-Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 06:18:45 -0400 (EDT)
> Resent-Message-Id: <200209061018.g86AIj225906@frink.w3.org>
> To: RDF Interest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>,
>         Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
> CC: Ashley Yakeley <ashley@semantic.org>
> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:15:06 +0100
> From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: rdf:parseType="daml:collection" 
> Resent-From: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> X-Mailing-List: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> archive/latest/6996
> X-Loop: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Resent-Sender: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
> List-Id: <www-rdf-interest.w3.org>
> List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> 
> 
> >>>Jos De_Roo said:
> > right, and clarification can be found at
> > http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/
> > http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-grammar-product
>     ions
> > and soon in
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
> > and there is indeed a rdf:parseType="Collection"
> 
> Yeah, I should note that I added that to my working version of the
> RDF/XML syntax draft last week, so it is fresh and shiny, and needs a
> good review.  This is an importing of the daml:collection mechanism
> into core RDF/XML.
> 
> The new bit:
>    http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#parseTypeContainerPropertyElt
> 
> desribes how the rdf:parseType="Collection" form expands into triples.
> 
> This is another abbreviation mechanism but what the triples mean

??  So we have stuff in the "core" with no meaning in RDF...??  
What??


> is
> for other documents to write about, especially WebOnt drafts like
> at the end of these working drafts:
> 
>   OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 Reference, 29 July 2002 
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-ref-20020729/#appb
> 
>  OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 Abstract Syntax 29 July 2002
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-absyn-20020729/#6
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 09:18:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:56 GMT