At 2002-10-08 09:16, Seth Russell wrote: >That is certainly true; however lamentable. Lamentable because our >tools do not seem to be able to share the higher level programming >resources simply because of the plethora of data models designers are >allowed to choose from. Lisp was great, it gave us a common data model, >we were able to share many programming resources. However, Lisp did >not seem to have enough restraints on the many ways we can represent >knowledge, we still have too many choices if we want our tools to share >methods. Have you considered a typed language such as Haskell? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WAReceived on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 20:51:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:56 GMT