> >I'd like to stick to identifying the nature of rdfs:Property & rdfs:Class, > >since I know that they are concepts, and I know what concepts are. > >I do not know what your RDF-MT symbols are. > > A property is represented by a resource with the type rdf:Property. > It can be used as the predicate in an RDF assertion. A class is > represented by a resource with the type rdfs:Class. It can be used as > the value of rdf:type. Slightly off topic, and at the risk of being wrong again (!): a property *is* a resource, it is not represented by a resource (although in some reified case it could be). "Resource" just means "thing" or "object in domain of discourse". The property/thing/resource is named/identified by a URI/URI-Ref. (the same holds for classes, etc.) (I'm also not on the WG or anything. I think the people on the WG are far too busy to participate. :-) -- sandroReceived on Thursday, 21 November 2002 04:58:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT