Re: [xml-dev] RDF : Headless Triples syntax

Danny Ayers scripsit:

> I can understand the need for an <rdf:RDF> wall around embedded RDF in the
> current syntax (to keep its Gothic structure out of sight). If however the
> RDF was restricted to (decapitated) one-layer statements, I reckon an
> <rdf:D> ha-ha is adequate.

Actually, rdf:RDF isn't required, and Reuters Health doesn't use it.

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
http://www.reutershealth.com            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
                .e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
                Please support Lojban!          http://www.lojban.org