On 2002-06-22 16:42, "ext Sampo Syreeni" <decoy@iki.fi> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > >> <!ENTITY rdf "rdf:"> >> >> <rdfx xmlns:rdf ="&rdf;" >> >> What's so nasty about this? It's a pattern I've been using for a while, >> and I think it really helps readability. > > Plus conciseness. WordNet RDF dumps seem to be doing the same sort of > thing, I think wisely. Well, the ENTITY declaration actually should be <!ENTITY rdf "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> but it was a snapshot of a work in progress, hence the semi-bogus namespace prefixes. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Sunday, 23 June 2002 07:38:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:00 GMT