- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:52:47 -0600
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <Andy_Seaborne@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> I entirely sympathise with the email burden. > > The reason why the www-rdf-rules list was chosen is because the scope of > that list includes query - not the ideal choice of name but the scope > message mentioned query [1]. It is a balance in using other mailing lists > (subscription tracking) and overloading a general email list (email content > too widely spread). > > Stepping back, I hope you will contribute to the discussions on query given > your experience in designing and using Versa. Yes. This is why I was grumbling. I do intend to join discussion wherever RDF query is the topic of the list. I accept the arguments you and Dan Brickley have offered, but it doesn't reduce the trepidation of joining another mailing list. Oh well. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston): http://www.xmlconference.com/ DAML Reference - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/05/01/damlref.html The Languages of the Semantic Web - http://www.newarchitectmag.com/documents/s= 2453/new1020218556549/index.html XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodel
Received on Saturday, 22 June 2002 20:20:34 UTC