Patrick, In examples.rdfx, you have: """ <!DOCTYPE rdfx [ <!ENTITY rdfx "voc://nokia.com/rdfx-1/"> <!ENTITY rdf "rdf:"> <!ENTITY rdfs "rdf:"> <!ENTITY xsd "xsd:"> <!ENTITY dc "dc:"> <!ENTITY foaf "foaf:"> <!ENTITY ex "ex:"> <!-- Please forgive the nasty abbreviated namespace URIs ;-) --> ]> <rdfx xmlns:rdf ="&rdf;" xmlns:rdfs ="&rdfs;" xmlns:xsd ="&xsd;" xmlns:dc ="&dc;" xmlns:foaf ="&foaf;" xmlns:ex ="&ex;" xmlns ="&rdfx;"> """ What's so nasty about this? It's a pattern I've been using for a while, and I think it really helps readability. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston): http://www.xmlconference.com/ DAML Reference - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/05/01/damlref.html The Languages of the Semantic Web - http://www.newarchitectmag.com/documents/s= 2453/new1020218556549/index.html XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodelReceived on Saturday, 22 June 2002 03:39:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:00 GMT