- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 11:49:51 +0300
- To: "ext Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On 2002-06-05 5:10, "ext Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> [Bill de hÓra]
>
>
>>> I disagree, Dan. The rdfs:isDefinedBy property does not point
>>> to a namespace, but to a resource.
>>
>> Here's the question: Are XML namespaces RDF resources? If a
>> collection of names identified by a URI reference can be an RDF
>> resource, then an XML namespace can be an RDF resource.
>>
>
> The actual value of an xml namespace (the identifier of a collection of
> names) is a URI reference. There could be a convention (or it could be in
> the Rec) that such a URI does identify an xml namespace as an RDF resource.
> After all, the uri reference for a namespace is supposed to be unique.
>
> An RDF resource can identify anything discussable, and a namespace is
> discussable.
>
> It would make a lot of sense to me.
I fully agree, and see no problems with a URI denoting a namespace, as
a collection of names, but then that URI should not denote anything
else, such as a functional vocabulary, a schema, a doctype, a "namespace
document", etc. etc.
Cheers,
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 04:45:57 UTC