W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2002

Re: Challenge for RDF Gurus :)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:43:01 -0500 (EST)
To: <tarod@softhome.net>
cc: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0202141732290.32202-100000@tux.w3.org>

[sniiiippp.......]

Guys, please pick a mailing list and stick to it. This thread isn't
interesting enough to merit crossposting to *3* RDF mailing lists. Most
threads aren't!

The RDF comments list is for formal feedback to W3C on our specifications.
Please do try not clutter the archives by crossposting general
discusson, as it makes it harder to scan them for explicit items of
feedback.

The logic list is for [[technical discussion concerning the design of
logic-based languages for use on the Web]], and seems in-scope for this
topic.  see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/ for full
list blurb.

If you prefer to use the most general RDF/SW mailing list,
www-rdf-interest, bear in mind that each post goes to several hundred
people. Sometimes discussing things offlist (perhaps cc:'ing
www-archive@w3.org, archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/)
can work well. I don't want to discourage people from using
www-rdf-interest, but it is worth doing what we can to reduce everyone's
email burden. Certainly, cross-posting to RDF three lists is excessive.

cheers,

Dan


-- 
mailto:danbri@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/People/DanBri/
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 17:43:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:53 GMT