- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:46:19 -0700
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- cc: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@snee.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> > >>>Bob DuCharme said: > > > > I know that the W3C's "RDF Validation Service" at > >http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ and the downloadable ARP RDF > >processor underneath it don't require RDF statements to be enclosed > >inside of an rdf:RDF element. Are there any others that anyone can suggest? > > rdf/xml as an XML application requires the rdf:RDF document element, > in order for it to be legal XML. Not in RDF 1.0. Please don't make the mistake of making rdf:RDF required in future RDF specs. There is no reason why a document can't have one top-level top node in order to make the RDF even less intrusive. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com A Python & XML Companion - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/12/11/py-xml.html XML class warfare - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6965 MusicBrainz metadata - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-thi nk14.html
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 15:05:56 UTC