From: "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net> > Should there at least be a simple syntax for me to "turn on" the > definition for these pre-defined things instead of duplicating > definitions all over the place? Some kind of include? Or maybe a > --think-really-hard? Could you give us some examples of the "pre-defined things" that you are talking about? Seth Russell http://robustai.net/sailor/Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 14:11:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:55 GMT