W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2002

Re: CWM Question

From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:12:33 -0700
Message-ID: <3D627881.EF93A011@prescod.net>
To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

"Sean B. Palmer" wrote:
> It's of great value when you have the rule to cope with it. There are
> hundreds of rules like this for the properties and classes in RDF, RDFS,
> and DAML. Check out:-
> http://infomesh.net/2001/05/rdflint/rules.n3

I notice daml:equivalentTo's definition is not in there.

> ...
> However, normally it's just annoying. You shouldn't use more triples than
> you can get away with, because it's a waste of data, and makes things
> difficult to read.

Sounds like a job for filtering to me.

Should there at least be a simple syntax for me to "turn on" the
definition for these pre-defined things instead of duplicating
definitions all over the place? Some kind of include? Or maybe a
"When I walk on the floor for the final execution, I'll wear a denim 
suit. I'll walk in there like Willie Nelson, John Wayne, Will Smith 
-- Men in Black -- James Brown. Maybe do a Michael Jackson moonwalk."
Congressman James Traficant.
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 13:15:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:42 UTC