W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2002

Re: How do Schemas support RDF collections?

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 13:07:17 -0700
Message-ID: <00b401c23fe0$5d2623c0$657ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
To: "Seth Ladd" <seth@brivo.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

From: "Seth Ladd" <seth@brivo.net>

> An internal one.  We're developing an ontology for our internal data
> structures.  We have Groups of things, and I was trying to find an
> efficient way to describe that.  I think we have to have multiple
> identical properties defined for a single object (instead of using a
> Bag) for our ontologies to define everything we need.

What do you mean by: "multiple  identical properties defined for a single
object" ?

We have that right now:

A r B.
C r B.
D r B.

We even have multiple identical properties for a single *subject* like:

A s B.
A s C.
A s D.

But if you want :

A q B.
A q B.
A q B.

Then, alas, that we don't have that.  Triples are unique within the
document, you end up with just one triple {A q B}.

Incidentally, why do you need any more than the second example {A s B. A s
C. A s D.}  to show that A is a member of three groups, and that some group
can have multiple members ?

Seth Russell
http://robustai.net/sailor/
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 16:07:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:55 GMT