I think you're confusing "Location" (RFC 2616 section 14.30) with "Content-Location". Note: The Content-Location header field (section 14.14) differs from Location in that the Content-Location identifies the original location of the entity enclosed in the request. It is therefore possible for a response to contain header fields for both Location and Content-Location. Also see section 13.10 for cache requirements of some methods. Neither do service for bridging the difference between me and my web page, but one could imagine using Content-Location as a reusable URI for the result of POST (although such use is not defined). Larry -- http://larry.masinter.netReceived on Saturday, 27 April 2002 14:49:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:53 GMT