I just finished going through some of the messages on the w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org Mail archives concerning literals. I am very concerned that the RDF Core WG is going down a completely wrong path with this work on literals. As an alternative proposal why not simply say that RDF literals are XML strings, and use the semantics for the XML Schema string datatype? Peter F. Patel-SchneiderReceived on Friday, 28 September 2001 11:19:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:53 GMT