W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2001

Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"

From: <tarod@softhome.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:42:31 GMT
Message-ID: <20011116164231.30066.qmail@softhome.net>
To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

  I don't know, but it will be a daml solution not a rdf solution, because
there is no rdf problem with domains, at least, in my opinion.

      Marc


Sean B. Palmer writes:

> > When I specify some domains I want to specify where I
> > can add this property, the property date should appear in
> > document and event.
> 
> Something like:-
> 
>    :date rdfs:domain [ daml:unionOf (:Document :Event) ] .
> 
> Perhaps? Conjunctive domains and ranges are in my experience the most
> common use, and since DAML lets you create new classes as unions of
> existing classes, there is no reason to oppose this.
> 
> --
> Kindest Regards,
> Sean B. Palmer
> @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
> :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
> 
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 12:17:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:52 GMT